<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scottish Blogger Dad &#187; Bits, bobs, odds, sods</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/category/bits-bobs-odds-sods/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com</link>
	<description>Craig McGill&#039;s blog on being a dad in Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:48:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>REVIEW: Amazon Kindle 3G &#8211; the poor man&#8217;s iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2011/03/30/review-amazon-kindle-3g-the-poor-mans-ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2011/03/30/review-amazon-kindle-3g-the-poor-mans-ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tablets are still the hot topic and, being a geek, I have of course lusted after one since the iPad came out. However, the price, battery life and weight of it put me off a bit &#8211; especially as 90% of the time it would be a glorified book. But I finally caved in and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><img class="alignleft" style="border: 4px solid black; margin: 5px;" src="http://blogkindle.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/kindle-3-in-cover.jpg" alt="" width="167" height="114" /></h2>
<p>Tablets are still the hot topic and, being a geek, I have of course lusted after one since the <strong>iPad</strong> came out. However, the price, battery life and weight of it put me off a bit &#8211; especially as 90% of the time it would be a glorified book. But I finally caved in and treated myself to a <strong>Kindle</strong>.</p>
<p>And you know what? It&#8217;s probably my favourite piece of tech kit ever&#8230;</p>
<p><span id="more-141"></span>I&#8217;m a bookaholic. I don&#8217;t deny it. I&#8217;ve got about 1400 titles in various shelves and boxes (and I&#8217;ve thrown out twice that many books). The first thing I do in anyone&#8217;s house is look at what books they read. It&#8217;s my thing. Sadly, I am well past the point of having space for books so if I was to continue to indulge in my habit, I needed to either start throwing more books out (gasp! No!) or find a Plan B. Plan B came digitally&#8230;</p>
<h2>Why iBooks isn&#8217;t that great</h2>
<p>When Apple announced<strong> iBooks</strong> I figured it was only going to be a matter of time before an <strong>iPad</strong> turned up in my hands. However, their bookstore selection (and prices at launch) were awful &#8211; it just wasn&#8217;t a good choice at all. But it had whetted my appetite. The I</p>
<p>saw Amazon had Kindle software for the <strong>iPhone</strong>, so I tried that.</p>
<p>Where it worked well for me was in darkened rooms and in the wee small hours, when one of the kids had woken up and needed cuddles to get back to sleep. It was easy enough to sit and read while the little one drifted back off.</p>
<p>The only downside to the screen on a phone was that it was very small and, if being perfectly honest, it felt like you weren&#8217;t taking a lot in. It was a decent way of reading but you couldn&#8217;t help feel that it could be better &#8211; especially for reading longer works.</p>
<h2>iPad v Kindle</h2>
<p>So I thought about a Kindle and then thought against it &#8211; especially as it&#8217;s not a colour screen. And then thought about it again. Then the iPad 2 came out and it still wasn&#8217;t <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">cheap</span> inexpensive &#8211; especially compared to the US price (I can&#8217;t believe we still have to moan about that in this day and age). It was also a bit big for just reading books (which would have been the primary function of it).</p>
<p>The iPad 2 pricing</p>
<p>wasn&#8217;t what pushed me into Amazon&#8217;s arms though. <a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/amazons-kindle-app-has-unti-june-30th-to-support-new-in-app-purchase-rules/82176" target="_blank">Alongside the price difference was the suggestion that the Kindle could be kicked off the iOS platform</a>. That was what pushed me over the edge for a few reasons:</p>
<ul>
<li>When Apple acts OTT in demands with others, that&#8217;s what Apple normally starts to decline,</li>
<li>The book choice on the Kindle was far, far superior so if I was going to be stuck with a platform, better to be one with a lot of books</li>
<li>Amazon are a good company to deal with &#8211; I&#8217;ve never had any hassles with them at all.</li>
</ul>
<p>But what Kindle to get? There&#8217;s a wifi one and a wifi/3G one. The 3G one comes in at £40 dearer but the 3G is free &#8211; and there&#8217;s a web browser&#8230;</p>
<h2>3G for me</h2>
<p>Being quite blunt about it, I knew that whatever I bought, the odds were that would be me &#8211; in terms of a tablet &#8211; for a while. An iPad would have to wait until other computer kit in the house was upgraded, the next kid has come along and a few other things (I also think Apple were miserable not putting Facetime HD in the iPad 2). So if I was buying something, I wanted it to be as functional as possible, so I went for the 3G option, effectively making it the poor man&#8217;s iPad.</p>
<h2>Kindle usage</h2>
<p>There&#8217;s not actually too much you can say about the usage. You take it out (the massively oversized) box, turn it on, set up an account and away you go. It&#8217;s as idiotproof as anything Apple ever made. It&#8217;s nice and light &#8211; yet solidly built &#8211; it drops nicely from 30 feet onto grass and still works, you can hold it one-handed for long periods of time, you can get really stuck into a book &#8211; and the claim is that it can hold 3,500 means it should do for a while, especially as the Kindle store is quite varied and seems to moving past the crime, horror and SF roots that it started with.</p>
<p>Having said that, it&#8217;s turned me into a right sad git. Not only am I going on spending sprees for new books and using the cheap prices to discover new authors like <a href="http://www.gordonferris.com" target="_blank"><strong>Gordon Ferris</strong></a> (<strong>The Hanging Shed</strong> is really good and probably the best spend of £1 ever &#8211; I liked it so much I&#8217;ve bought the hardback as a gift for someone) but I&#8217;m actually going and buying digital copies of books I already own.</p>
<p>It also plays MP3s but I haven&#8217;t given that a go yet.</p>
<p>Also, the battery life is good but not &#8217;30 days without a charge&#8217; as some people state. You&#8217;ll get a week or two out of it no problems though.</p>
<p>The 3G is really good &#8211; it gets a signal in parts of the country where few of the mobile operators do.</p>
<h3>Newspapers on the Kindle</h3>
<p>Newspapers look as good on it as books do &#8211; when someone takes the time to format them correctly &#8211; and the whole process is just nice and simple. Having said that, it is tragic that there&#8217;s no Scottish newspapers on here, but this device could easily become my primary news outlet so that&#8217;s more money for The Indy, The Times and Daily Telegraph &#8211; papers I wouldn&#8217;t normally buy but if that&#8217;s all I can get, I&#8217;ll take it &#8211; the convenience over-rides everything else. (<a href="http://www.cultofmac.com/kindle-beats-ipad-with-nyt-paywall-bypass/88478#more-88478" target="_blank">The Kindle also gets round the NY Times paywall</a>).</p>
<p>The newspaper aspect also makes the 3G very handy. Wherever I am, it just updates every morning for me without the need to hook up to a PC/mac.</p>
<p>I know <strong>Calibre</strong> gives you options for adding newsfeeds to the Kindle but for the love of me I cannot get it to work. I will at some point though. (Same with Instapaper&#8230;)</p>
<h3>Browsing the web on the Kindle</h3>
<p>This is weird. Who knew the web came in monochrome? It&#8217;s like watching a B&amp;W telly and remembering how things used to be &#8211; except the web was always colour. As a browser it&#8217;s not perfect but it does in a pinch. You can access webmail and Twitter &#8211; didn&#8217;t try Facebook &#8211; and general pages. There&#8217;s not much more you can say &#8211; it works for a basic browser.</p>
<h2>Kindle quirks</h2>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say it&#8217;s perfect though. In fact, there&#8217;s a few places it could be improved:</p>
<ul>
<li>What&#8217;s with the wacky screensaver pics? Let me add my own, pick one that I like or at least get rid of the John Steinbeck pic where he looks like Kevin Costner with a &#8216;tache.</li>
<li>Organising. If you buy a Kindle and set up collections &#8211; as you will because if you fill this thing you&#8217;ll have 350 pages to scroll through &#8211; do it from the start. The file organising structure on this thing is terrible, slow and clumsy.</li>
<li>I can play MP3s but not view pics? What gives. I can view comics.</li>
<li>Reading in darkness is impossible. Why it doesn&#8217;t give you the option to do white text on a black background I do not know. Would probably be useful for those with sight impairments too. The odds are this was to sell the over-priced cover with light but WOB would have been a great feature.</li>
<li>The more popular this gets &#8211; along with the iPad &#8211; will we see a rise in book piracy? It&#8217;s already fairly rife&#8230;</li>
<li>You don&#8217;t see the covers of the books &#8211; just a list of titles &#8211; which is a shame</li>
</ul>
<h2>Suggestions for Kindle 4</h2>
<ul>
<li>You could lose the keyboard and probably have it as a basic on-screen touchscreen keyboard, making this device even smaller. But that may push the price up.</li>
<li>It lacks a lot of the ability to personalise</li>
</ul>
<h2>Overall</h2>
<p>This is the best gadget I have. Yes, it doesn&#8217;t have the same relaxing feel as reading a paperback but all that means to me is that when I pick up a paperback or hardback now it needs to be for a special reason or a book I really want. Everything that&#8217;s a casual purchase can be Kindled &#8211; especially when the Kindle prices are better than the paperbacks.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not sexy. While it&#8217;s nice, don&#8217;t think ever whipping this out somewhere will get you laid. But that&#8217;s a good thing because if you whip this out, you&#8217;ve probably got a good book you want to read anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2011/03/30/review-amazon-kindle-3g-the-poor-mans-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick review: SECC babyshow &#8211; worth going to?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/24/quick-review-secc-babyshow-worth-going-to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/24/quick-review-secc-babyshow-worth-going-to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[babyshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SECC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick review of the SECC babyshow (I&#8217;ll do a longer review later) as time is pressed, I&#8217;ll just do highs and lows&#8230; Highs If you are into reusable nappies you are in for a treat as there&#8217;s about five companies selling them There&#8217;s some really interesting and unique items on sale Mothercare have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick review of the <strong><a href="http://www.thebabyshowscotland.com/" target="_blank">SECC babyshow</a></strong> (I&#8217;ll do a longer review later) as time is pressed, I&#8217;ll just do highs and lows&#8230;<span id="more-127"></span></p>
<h1><span style="color: #00ff00;">Highs</span></h1>
<ol>
<li>If you are into reusable nappies you are in for a treat as there&#8217;s about five companies selling them</li>
<li>There&#8217;s some really interesting and unique items on sale</li>
<li>Mothercare have a great discount on &#8211; but combine the show discount with the baby and me club voucher booklet to save even more</li>
<li>If you join Costco, it&#8217;s cheaper for the Bio-oil than the Bio-oil stand</li>
<li>Emma&#8217;s Diary is worth looking out for and signing up</li>
<li>There&#8217;s a mini-creche and also a play area for kids</li>
<li>There&#8217;s quite a lot to look at</li>
<li><strong>Stokke</strong> have a nice layout and friendly/informative staff on hand. Go see their large, oversized furniture</li>
<li>Lots of buggies on display</li>
<li><strong><a href="http://www.more4mums.co.uk/" target="_blank">More4Mums</a></strong> are there &#8211; go support the internet retailers!</li>
<li>Good-sized baby changing area</li>
</ol>
<h1><span style="color: #00ff00;">Lows</span></h1>
<ol>
<li>Entry is £8 (you get a free showguide worth £4 though) and parking is £6 on top of that</li>
<li>NPower are absolute swines at the place. They&#8217;ll pounce on you constantly</li>
<li>It could be very busy. The Friday was</li>
<li>Lots of people talking about reusable nappies</li>
<li>Some of the stuff will have you saying WTF</li>
<li>Did I mention the NPower ambush squads?</li>
<li>There&#8217;s not a lot of stuff on show-special discounts compared to previous years</li>
<li>Not a lot of larger, practical parenting items like sterilisers on sale</li>
<li>NPower are probably preparing bear traps as we speak to trap you in order to speak to you</li>
</ol>
<p>Is it worth going to? I have to say I thought so and had a great time. There&#8217;s some quirky things there and it seemed like less of a chore than when I went in previous years but the wife thought it was better in the past, each to their own I suppose.</p>
<p>Oh and one last thing: when did Glasgow become <strong>iCandy</strong> capital of Europe? Seriously, every second pushchair seemed to be one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/24/quick-review-secc-babyshow-worth-going-to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kodak Zi8 Review: a videocamera for parents?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/kodak-zi8-review-a-videocamera-for-parents/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/kodak-zi8-review-a-videocamera-for-parents/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Being a dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Picked up a Kodak Zi8 for work purposes the other day, but I&#8217;d be a liar if I didn&#8217;t say that I&#8217;ll be using it for personal uses as well, but how does it shape up as a video camera for capturing the family moments? What&#8217;s the good points and the bad points? Is it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picked up a <strong><a style="&quot;border:none" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002J9I3HM?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=contemanag-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738&amp;creativeASIN=B002J9I3HM&quot;&gt;Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera - Black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=">Kodak Zi8</a></strong> for work purposes the other day, but I&#8217;d be a liar if I didn&#8217;t say that I&#8217;ll be using it for personal uses as well, but how does it shape up as a video camera for capturing the family moments? What&#8217;s the good points and the bad points? Is it worth the £120 or so that it costs?</p>
<p><span id="more-125"></span><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" title="http://www.kineda.com/photos/gear/kodak_zi8.jpg" src="http://www.kineda.com/photos/gear/kodak_zi8.jpg" alt="" width="207" height="139" />I ordered the</span><a style="&quot;border:none" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002J9I3HM?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=contemanag-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738&amp;creativeASIN=B002J9I3HM&quot;&gt;Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera - Black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="> </a></strong><strong><a style="&quot;border:none" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002J9I3HM?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=contemanag-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738&amp;creativeASIN=B002J9I3HM&quot;&gt;Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera - Black&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=">Zi8</a><span style="font-weight: normal;"> in black (but it&#8217;s also available in <a style="&quot;border:none" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002J9I3I6?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=contemanag-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738&amp;creativeASIN=B002J9I3I6&quot;&gt;Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera - Raspberry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=" target="_blank">raspberry</a> and <a style="&quot;border:none" href="&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B002J9I3HW?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=contemanag-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1634&amp;creative=6738&amp;creativeASIN=B002J9I3HW&quot;&gt;Kodak Zi8 HD Pocket Video Camera - Aqua Blue&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src=" target="_blank">aqua blue</a>, though I would imagine the black is the most popular) and I&#8217;ll spare you the usual unboxing nonsense &#8211; you get the cables for hooking up to HDMI (HD) and normal TVs, a little strap, a manual that&#8217;s straight from the Apple book of minimal decent content and that&#8217;s pretty much it, which is what you want to be honest &#8211; packaging out the road, jump in and play! </span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">The phone itself is about the size and width of a Blackberry or thicker/wee bit shorter than an iPhone 3GS.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">(The main reason for getting a Zi8 was that I was impressed by it having an external mike socket. Having played with Flips, I thought the sound was the weak issue, so the Zi8 lets that be addressed.)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">But you won&#8217;t get to play for long &#8211; the battery&#8217;s pretty run down, so it needs a charge, so add two hours to the &#8220;I just wanna play with it&#8221; moment. And then make sure you have a SD card for it as the internal memory is good for about 5 seconds of footage (get </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">Class 4</span><span style="font-weight: normal;"> or higher for best video recording). Oh and then, you might notice that your machine doesn&#8217;t have the latest version of the firmware installed (way to go Kodak!) as they appear to have shipped 10 billion models with the 1.03 firmware (1.06 is the latest and, judging by online reaction, is considerably better).</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">This is where the Mac/PC difference comes in: there&#8217;s a bunch of software preinstalled for the PC, nothing for the Mac. Also, <a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=15504" target="_blank">go here</a> and you&#8217;ll see that the Mac upgrade installations &#8211; which include buying a memory card reader &#8211; are far more of a pain in the backside than the PC version.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">However, that&#8217;s a load of nonsense, here&#8217;s the simple guide to upgrading Kodak zi8 firmware on a mac:</span></strong></p>
<ol>
<li>Attach camera to Mac</li>
<li>Turn it on, backup anything on your card</li>
<li>Create a folder called SYSTEM onto memory card on Zi8</li>
<li>Copy firmware download files over to SYSTEM on card</li>
<li>Turn Zi8 off, disconnect</li>
<li>Turn Zi8 on and you&#8217;ll be prompted to upgrade &#8211; basically go with the green tick each time</li>
<li>Once done, reformat your card</li>
</ol>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">After all that, you can get going and it&#8217;s </span><span style="font-weight: normal;">ACTION</span><span style="font-weight: normal;">!</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">I&#8217;ll let you watch the clips (all of which are available in HD) and then I&#8217;ll post my thoughts. Each of them was filmed at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/720p" target="_blank">720p</a>/<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_rate" target="_blank">60fps</a> as that appears to be the best setting, especially for YouTube videos. Apart from the last video, the microphone used is the internal one. No tripods were used in any of these shots &#8211; it&#8217;s all handheld with Kodak&#8217;s Image Stabilisation software, EIS, turned on.</span></strong></p>
<h2><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 in test at night</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">The first chance I had to play was at 2am in the morning. Now the Zi8 has no flash or lighting aid &#8211; either built-in or attached. Apart from the car at the end, there&#8217;s little movement. I had been told that the Zi8 &#8211; due to the small lens &#8211; would be rotten at night so this held no surprises for me.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luQHy7y2Z_4[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 in recording a panto</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">(oh no it doesn&#8217;t! Oh yes it&#8230; oh shut up)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Junior received a play puppet theatre kit and has been putting on ad lib shows at every opportunity, including this gathering at the inlaws on Jan 1. Now the lighting is low in this (just one corner lamp) but it gave me a chance to play with the zoom. What surprised me was how much the colour dipped when zooming in. The zoom is also a bit jittery, but as with all digital zooms, you really shouldn&#8217;t use it anyway.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sdca2xD_tMY[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 in average light test</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Heading kind of says it all. Average living room light (basically one halogen corner lamp about 6 foot)</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IHL8koIA3Gg[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 in bright light test</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Heading kind of says it all again. The aforementioned light with also the main overhead living room light on.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g38rN-sVpr4[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 and motion 1</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Five year old girl doing five year old things.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRNHO5oIgMw[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 and motion 2</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Five year old girl doing five year old things, will be mortified when she hits 12.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZ6jT9nqB84[/youtube]</span></strong></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 tested with external mike</span></strong></h2>
<p>The start and end of the segments have the internal mike being used but from 0:50 to 2:20 a clip-on lapel mike (£25 from Maplins) was used. I thought the sound from the internal mike was decent and was disappointed by the <strong>Maplins&#8217;</strong> external mike. However, it may well be that it will work better for one-on-one interviews (which throws it back into the realm of work related stuff) and I&#8217;ll cover that over at <strong><a href="http://www.contently-managed.com" target="_blank">Contently Managed</a></strong>.</p>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gB1shxE10Y[/youtube]</p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Kodak Zi8 as a camera</span></strong></h2>
<p><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">In all honesty, it&#8217;s as decent a camera as you find on the likes of the N95 and slightly better than the iPhone 3GS, both of which were trumped by the 4 megapixel Canon ixus I have from about six years ago.</span></strong><br />
<img class="alignright" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" title="http://www.geardiary.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/kodak-zi8.jpg" src="http://www.geardiary.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/kodak-zi8.jpg" alt="" width="266" height="286" /></p>
<h2 style="font-size: 1.5em;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Other points and notes:</span></strong></h2>
<ol>
<li>Uploading HD to YouTube takes forever and a day. Well, longer than normal anyway. The panto clip here took 30 mins to upload (the one at the end took 40 mins). I&#8217;m dreading a longer video (I may even try and get a physical broadband connection again instead of wifi to see if that speeds stuff up)</li>
<li>This is a dinky little camera</li>
<li>Suggestions for the Zi9 would be: external earphones socket (for checking levels but also watching long videos) and some form of lighting. However both would boost the price probably. A larger lens would be a real winner, but again, that&#8217;s me being greedy (probably).</li>
<li>Raspberry and aqua blue? WTF?</li>
<li>As this just deals with .MOV files &#8211; that&#8217;s what it creates &#8211; I wonder if it could also be a movie player if you added a film in that format to it. Makes it a rather cheap movie player for trips (You could load it up with about 64-80GB of movies for the same price as an iPod Touch)</li>
<li>Getting the HDMI socket open is a nightmare, well a pain and hassle, if you don&#8217;t have nails.</li>
<li>The USB port looks well dodgy (see pic). It&#8217;s very short, rubbery and unless you have the computer and USB connector on a flat table, you&#8217;ll be paranoid that the connector is going to fall/break. If there is such a thing, an extension cable might be handy.</li>
<li>Having to upgrade the firmware out the box is ridiculous.</li>
<li>The more bright light you an give this camera, the happier it will be.</li>
</ol>
<p>Is it worth a buy? I don&#8217;t regret it, put it that way, but I will probably end up using it more for work than personal stuff. But I will have it in my pocket when possible to catch some moments because it&#8217;s far better than the iPhone 3GS (which, to me, is a far poorer video camera than even the Nokia N95 from a few years ago). I also like the idea of carrying around a few memory cards instead of tapes for a big video recorder.</p>
<p>If you want to see some comparison videos, here&#8217;s some more video links:</p>
<h1 style="margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 19px; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">Kodak Zi8 Review</h1>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7qPzfjtDmI&amp;feature=related[/youtube]</p>
<h2>Flip Mino Killer: Kodak Zi8 Review</h2>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KQ2NV463deQ&amp;feature=related[/youtube]</p>
<h1 style="margin-top: 5px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-left: 0px; outline-width: 0px; outline-style: initial; outline-color: initial; font-size: 19px; background-image: initial; background-repeat: initial; background-attachment: initial; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial; background-color: transparent; font-weight: bold; background-position: initial initial; padding: 0px; border: 0px initial initial;">Flip UltraHD vs. Kodak Zi8 &#8211; Review by HighTechDad</h1>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oar_2atL7lo&amp;feature=related[/youtube]</p>
<h2>GizmoDuck Review : Kodak Zi8 vs Creative Vado HD</h2>
<p>[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_lPBb06-o&amp;feature=related[/youtube]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/kodak-zi8-review-a-videocamera-for-parents/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-shirts for pregnant geek types</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/t-shirts-for-pregnant-geek-types/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/t-shirts-for-pregnant-geek-types/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Being a dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like these: From Think Geek]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.shinyshiny.tv/2009/10/gadget_t-shirts.html" target="_blank">I like these</a>:<span id="more-121"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://craig-mcgill.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bc2c_loading_maternity.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-801" title="bc2c_loading_maternity" src="http://craig-mcgill.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/bc2c_loading_maternity-263x350.jpg" alt="bc2c_loading_maternity" width="263" height="350" /></a></p>
<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-802" title="geek_inside_maternity" src="http://craig-mcgill.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/geek_inside_maternity-263x350.jpg" alt="geek_inside_maternity" width="263" height="350" /></p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/?cpg=cj" target="_blank">Think Geek</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/23/t-shirts-for-pregnant-geek-types/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m MAD? No, I&#8217;m up for a MAD. Yipee!</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/06/im-mad-no-im-up-for-a-mad-yipee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/06/im-mad-no-im-up-for-a-mad-yipee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 12:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Being a dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dad stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MAD Awards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? I&#8217;m a writer, we get excited when get nomimated for things. It&#8217;s what we&#8217;re like. Besides, this is a more interesting election than the other one. Anyway, word reaches me that I&#8217;ve been put forward for a MAD award (best new blog), so I&#8217;m all chuffed. Or I was until I looked at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" title="MAD awards" src="http://www.the-mads.com/images/mad-nominated.gif" alt="" width="150" height="165" />What? I&#8217;m a writer, we get excited when get nomimated for things. It&#8217;s what we&#8217;re like. Besides, this is a more interesting election than the other one.</p>
<p>Anyway, <a href="http://twitter.com/The_MADs/status/11498853542" target="_blank">word reaches me</a> that I&#8217;ve been put forward for a <a href="http://www.the-mads.com/" target="_blank"><strong>MAD award</strong></a> (best new blog), so I&#8217;m all chuffed. Or I was until I looked at the amount of entries and the quality of the competition (warning, if you go blog reading in the links there you&#8217;ll lose hours) (<a href="http://www.the-mads.com/nominate.htm" target="_blank">and if you do do that, don&#8217;t forget to vote for me first</a> <img src='http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ).</p>
<p>Nah, who am I kidding? I&#8217;m still chuffed.</p>
<p>Anyway, the point is that there&#8217;s some top entries over there well worth reading if you&#8217;re into the dad/mum blogging scene <a href="http://twitter.com/The_MADs" target="_blank">(The awards are on Twitter too.</a>) and if you&#8217;ve ever wanted to dip your toes into the blogging water then <a href="http://www.the-mads.com/become-a-mad-blogger.htm" target="_blank">there&#8217;s a guide there for that</a>.</p>
<p>Now is it unethical to create email addresses for your unborn child and have him vote&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/06/im-mad-no-im-up-for-a-mad-yipee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saturday, April 3 9:14pm</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/03/saturday-april-3-914pm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/03/saturday-april-3-914pm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Bump...]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Daughter...]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One wee one lies sleeping, curled up in a ball, almost like a wee hamster scurrying away from any light that might disturb, sooking her thumb, the other arm hooked round her favourite ted and a brand-new Easter Bunny; she&#8217;s finally fallen asleep after worries the Bunny wouldn&#8217;t come because she hasn&#8217;t managed to give [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One wee one lies sleeping<span id="more-60"></span>, curled up in a ball, almost like a wee hamster scurrying away from any light that might disturb, sooking her thumb, the other arm hooked round her favourite ted and a brand-new Easter Bunny; she&#8217;s finally fallen asleep after worries the Bunny wouldn&#8217;t come because she hasn&#8217;t managed to give up thumb-sucking. She said she&#8217;d be dreaming about what she can do with two whole weeks off school, though given she had a bedtime treat of watching a film, I&#8217;d expect some Disney/Alice in Wonderland characters to pop into the dreams too.</p>
<p>I kiss her forehead gently as she murmurs a little. I wonder where five years went and wish they had been in more slow-motion.</p>
<p>I go next door and the other lady of the house is also out like a light, trying to get some restful sleep to take the strain off her sore legs and back. Again, all cosied-up like a hamster, but she&#8217;ll wake up in the middle of the night a few times before giving up the ghost around 6am, but between now and then there should be some respite. I don&#8217;t lean over to kiss her forehead because if I wake her up there will be hell to pay.</p>
<p>And inside her sleeps and dreams a little bundle of something. For you the world is always quite dark still (your mum probably shouldn&#8217;t have work so much navy and black all the time), but it&#8217;s warm &#8211; cramped, but warm. I have no idea what your little dreams are like &#8211; probably of somewhere you can stretch without hitting organs &#8211; but I hope they&#8217;re nice and I hope they let you know you&#8217;re loved. Failing that, I hope you feel loved.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a wild Saturday night by any definition &#8211; in fact it hardly has a pulse &#8211; but seeing you three, still, content, at peace. I&#8217;ll take that tonight. The wind can howl outside and it can stay there. In here, it&#8217;s tranquil sleeps for all.</p>
<p>Sleep tight the three of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/04/03/saturday-april-3-914pm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When it&#8217;s OK to cheat on your wife&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/31/when-its-ok-to-cheat-on-your-wife/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/31/when-its-ok-to-cheat-on-your-wife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dad stuff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blame Dan over at All That Comes With It and Sally Whittle for this one (between the heading and that line, that should have people wondering&#8230;) Warning: really hosed HTML ahead. Dan and Sally have both posted about their Freebie Five &#8211; basically the five famous people that it&#8217;s OK to have sex with and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blame Dan over at <strong>All That Comes With It</strong> and Sally Whittle for this one (between the heading and that line, that should have people wondering&#8230;) <strong>Warning: really hosed HTML ahead.</strong></p>
<p><span id="more-52"></span><a href="http://allthatcomeswithit.com/archives/761" target="_blank"><strong>Dan</strong></a> and <strong><a href="http://www.whosthemummy.co.uk/2010/03/the-freebie-five-.html#comment-6a00d8345202e469e201310ffaaecc970c" target="_blank">Sally</a></strong> have both posted about their Freebie Five &#8211; basically the five famous people that it&#8217;s OK to have sex with and not count as two-timing. Now I seem to recall plenty of pub chat with the likes of Catherine Ferns about this and the wife always had a pass too &#8211; and the rule was that if they were famous, it was OK to have a one-nighter as people are only human and so on (though I recall there was a ban on kiss-and-telling to the papers).</p>
<p>Anyway, the wife always went for <strong>Kevin Costner</strong> and more lately, <strong>Viggo Mortenson</strong>. I think <strong>Gerard Butler</strong> might have been in there too but his film choices are actually overcoming the looks of his body.</p>
<p>But it got me thinking. I&#8217;ve always had two choices, but who would the five be? (as with all male fantasy lists, Jessica Rabbit would be there but she&#8217;s not real, so no) (also, honeys of a previous era like <strong>Elizabeth Montgomery</strong>, <strong>Erin Gray</strong> and <strong>Lynda Carter</strong> don&#8217;t count) (slight brag as well: when your mobile has the numbers for a page 3 model, the last three Miss Scotland&#8217;s, a Miss UK and at two TV newsreaders, it&#8217;s a bit hard to think of hot unavailables and a lot of my girl friends are very good looking.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this for about six hours now and I&#8217;m still no further forward. There&#8217;s the Two who have always been there plus one more, but I&#8217;m stuck for a Three and a Four. Also, I&#8217;ve been struck by a conscience and it seems ridiculous to pass judgement purely on some looks and an acting career when at least I know a bit more about the two that have always been on the list.</p>
<p>Anyway, here&#8217;s the best effort I can do&#8230;</p>
<h2><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://www.thefashioninsider.com/dat/video/Photo_0_f6030ac802c7659626435c29c747b758.JPG" alt="" width="400" height="500" />Mila Jovovich</h2>
<p>She&#8217;s stunning. She&#8217;s a decent actress, a supermodel, a musician, seems to have a great, offbeat sense of humour, just all-round wonderful. And yes, I know she has a slight but hot lookalike in the shape of <strong>Lauren German</strong>.<img class="alignright" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMTY3NDg3MzAyMF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNTU2NzI2MQ@@._V1._SX315_SY400_.jpg" alt="" width="189" height="240" /></p>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://www.topnews.in/files/Chelsea_Clinton.jpg" alt="" width="206" height="205" /></p>
<h2>Chelsea Clinton</h2>
<p>Even when she was in the White House (and of a legal age I hasten to add), I thought there was something cute about Chelsea and I still think so. (yes, even when she had curly hair).</p>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2></h2>
<h2>Olivia Wilde</h2>
<p>If you have to ask why, you are just blind. If you are blind, sorry I offended you. In fact, she deserves two pics.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://i483.photobucket.com/albums/rr196/cooltool/olivia1.jpg" alt="" width="315" height="389" /></p>
<p><img class="alignnone" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1Ssoxfl0MvQ/SNyAB4Ubw5I/AAAAAAAAFGo/9FCIkC1fhu0/s400/Olivia+Wilde.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="400" /></p>
<h2><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: large;"><span style="font-size: x-large;"><span><strong><br />
</strong></span></span></span></h2>
<h2><img class="alignright" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://www.levangelista.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10004/LindaEvangelistaColorAppeal.jpg" alt="" width="262" height="320" /></h2>
<h2><strong>Linda Evangelista</strong></h2>
<p>This was nearly going to be <strong>Christie Brinkley</strong> for the teenage me. (I think her marriage to Billy Joel was the one that gave every bloke hope that they could pull the stunning girl. But if I include teenage crushes we need to have <strong>Linda Evans</strong> from Dynasty, so out they go.) Linda Evangelista is just stunningly beautiful.<br />
<span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: 800;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 20px; font-weight: 800;">Megan Fox</span></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" src="http://thecount.com/wp-content/uploads/megan_fox300a.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="400" /></p>
<p>This one was nearly <strong>Courtney Cox</strong> (Hot since she appeared in the Springsteen video, the best thing in Cocoon and hot in Friends until near the end,) but then I remembered the lovely Megan. Hey, <a href="http://thethumbcast.com/">I helped name a podcast after her</a>, so I&#8217;ve got to put her in here&#8230;</p>
<p>(Runner-up: <strong>Rebecca Romjin</strong>. Sorry honey.)</p>
<p><img class="alignright" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_h5b5dSQpcc8/SoTiMdE9atI/AAAAAAAAAAs/bzyQcZ9wxQE/s320/rebecca-romijn-hotsexy.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="311" /></p>
<p>Now, if you&#8217;ll excuse me, I&#8217;m off for a shower. I feel slightly seedy itemising women like this&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway it seems only fair I should taint others, so I call upon <a href="http://www.iainmhepburn.com/">Iain Hepburn</a>, <a href="http://scottdouglas.wordpress.com/">Scott Douglas,</a> <a href="http://milnemedia.typepad.com/">Shaun Milne</a>, <a href="http://www.completetosh.com/">Neil McIntosh</a> and <a href="http://ananyah.com/blog/">Ananyah</a> to name their five that would be fair game to them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/31/when-its-ok-to-cheat-on-your-wife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;re taking a baby to see WHAT? Kick Ass? I&#8217;d kick your ass for that</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/20/youre-taking-a-baby-to-see-what-kick-ass-id-kick-your-ass-for-that/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/20/youre-taking-a-baby-to-see-what-kick-ass-id-kick-your-ass-for-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 01:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Being a dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dad stuff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comics and kids]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graeme Rose sent me a tweet yesterday and I was a bit busy at the time. All I saw was a reference to the film Kick Ass and groaned (long story, will explain at the end*). When I actually saw what he was talking about, I couldn&#8217;t believe it &#8211; a cinema in Dundee is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.dca.org.uk/whats-on/films/bring-a-baby-kick-ass.html"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px; border: 2px solid black;" title="Kick Ass" src="http://www.dca.org.uk/uploads/lg_KickAss.jpg" alt="" width="60" height="60" /></a><a href="http://twitter.com/juxtagon/status/10719371061">Graeme Rose sent me a tweet yesterday</a></strong> and I was a bit busy at the time. All I saw was a reference to the film <strong>Kick Ass</strong> and groaned (long story, will explain at the end*). When I actually saw what he was talking about, I couldn&#8217;t believe it &#8211; a cinema in Dundee is giving parents the chance to take under-18 month old kids into this ultra-violent film.<br />
<span id="more-48"></span> <a href="http://www.dca.org.uk/whats-on/films/bring-a-baby-kick-ass.html"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.dca.org.uk/whats-on/films/bring-a-baby-kick-ass.html">The Dundee Contemporary Arts is inviting people in with under-18 month old kids to see Kick Ass on May 6</a>. (That TBA at the end isn&#8217;t for the certificate BTW, I think it&#8217;s telling you that the words t*t, bas**rd and ass probably feature lots in the movie.) (Yes, that was a gag.)</p>
<p>For those who don&#8217;t know, Kick Ass tells the tale of a teen who decides to become a superhero &#8211; but without the powers &#8211; he gets beat up, tries again, gets filmed on YouTube, becomes a celebrity and then discovers there are other vigilantes in town, including a foul-mouthed, ultra-violent little girl. <a href="http://craig-mcgill.com/2008/11/mark-millars-kick-ass-review-of-the-movie-script/" target="_blank">I did a review here</a>.</p>
<p>Now I know it&#8217;s great that parents get a chance to see films in the cinema. I appreciate that. I would just find a babysitter, but not everyone is that fortunate that they can find at least one person in this world to watch their child for two hours or so.</p>
<p>But this is not a film to take kids to for a few reasons:</p>
<p>1) Under-18 months or not, kids still pick up on stuff. And if this is anything like the comic, there will be some very choice language.<br />
2) It&#8217;s violent and if you have a kid watching the screen, do you really want that going into your kid&#8217;s head?<br />
3) What are you doing letting someone so young watch a screen anyway? (this one, I&#8217;ll admit is just me. Many people have no issue with young kids and TV)</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s nice that the <strong><a href="http://twitter.com/DCAdundee" target="_blank">DCA</a></strong> is helping to promote a film created by a Scot, I applaud the idea of cinema for parents, but the concept&#8217;s a bit weak here. I accept that it might be cost-prohibitive to build a softplay for the kids so adults can go and watch the movie for a while without the cries of a child.</p>
<p>But this is not a movie for wee ones.</p>
<p>(I still remember the kids aged 6-10 going into see <strong>The Dark Knight</strong>. Not many lasted past the scene with the pencil. And again, what were the parents thinking&#8230;)</p>
<p>Now Graeme thinks someone at the DCA just went &#8216;oh it&#8217;s based on a comic, it will be OK&#8217; but they haven&#8217;t. The text for the event states:</p>
<blockquote><p>It has everything you’d want from a traditional comicbook adaptation but it also has a wicked foul-mouthed sense of humour.</p></blockquote>
<p>Whoever picked this, knows exactly what the film is. Now this might just be a PR stunt &#8211; shame on me then &#8211; but if not, it&#8217;s incredulous. No doubt some people will say I&#8217;m being over-protective and so on, but I don&#8217;t think so. This is a very violent/strongly-worded film. You let a kid watch this, you might as well let them watch anything. Good luck with the psychiatry bills.</p>
<p>*As you may have guessed &#8211; <a href="http://craig-mcgill.com/2008/11/mark-millars-kick-ass-review-of-the-movie-script/">here&#8217;s my review of the movie script from back in 2008</a> &#8211; I didn&#8217;t like Kick Ass as a comic or a script. It&#8217;s nothing against Mark Millar, he&#8217;s a very nice guy, has written some really good stuff and I wish him all the best. Kick Ass though, just didn&#8217;t appeal to me. Even worse, I can already see some of the stunts that will happen around this film, the inevitable Daily Mail outrage and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/20/youre-taking-a-baby-to-see-what-kick-ass-id-kick-your-ass-for-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scottish Baby Show</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/05/scottish-baby-show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/05/scottish-baby-show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was meant to be a post about the upcoming <strong>Scottish Baby Show</strong> and how I was going to cover it and have some fun with the exhibitors, but instead the organisers have said that any bloggers going can't do pictures or video or interview exhibitors, so that's that scuppered. <a href="http://www.contently-managed.com/blog/2010/03/04/prfail-scottish-baby-show-to-bloggers-youre-not-welcome/" target="_blank">You can read more here, where I put on the social media dayjob hat</a>.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was meant to be a post about the upcoming <strong>Scottish Baby Show</strong> and how I was going to cover it and have some fun with the exhibitors, but instead the organisers have said that any bloggers going can&#8217;t do pictures or video or interview exhibitors, so that&#8217;s that scuppered. <a href="http://www.contently-managed.com/blog/2010/03/04/prfail-scottish-baby-show-to-bloggers-youre-not-welcome/" target="_blank">You can read more here, where I put on the social media dayjob hat</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/03/05/scottish-baby-show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Government named a site for kids after a gay porn site? WTF?</title>
		<link>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/02/04/the-government-named-a-site-for-kids-after-a-gay-porn-site-wtf/</link>
		<comments>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/02/04/the-government-named-a-site-for-kids-after-a-gay-porn-site-wtf/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 23:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Being a dad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bits, bobs, odds, sods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/?p=37</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story&#8217;s here, but dear God what sort of moron doesn&#8217;t check URLs and brand names in this day and age&#8230;incredible. Well done More4Mums for finding out about this. And Kudos to Gordon Macintyre Kemp for revealing it. And before anyone asks &#8211; this isn&#8217;t about anti-gay or anti-sex (I&#8217;m very much in favour of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bit.ly/byW7gN " target="_blank">The story&#8217;s here</a>, but dear God what sort of moron doesn&#8217;t check URLs and brand names in this day and age&#8230;incredible. Well done <strong><a href="http://www.more4mums.co.uk/" target="_blank">More4Mums</a></strong> for finding out about this. And Kudos to <a href="http://thedrum.co.uk/blogs/gordonmacintyrekemp/2010/02/04/directgov-government-services-and-gay-porn-all-in-one-place/" target="_blank">Gordon Macintyre Kemp</a> for revealing it.</p>
<p>And before anyone asks &#8211; this isn&#8217;t about anti-gay or anti-sex (I&#8217;m very much in favour of both as long as it&#8217;s with consenting adults) &#8211; it&#8217;s a) about not having to worry about what the little one is looking at online (even though she never is at home, only at school) and b) that we have such half-wits in charge of branding at a Government level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.scottish-blogger-dad.com/2010/02/04/the-government-named-a-site-for-kids-after-a-gay-porn-site-wtf/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

